Bridge and route aggregation that refuses paths breaking your own safety rules.
Sade sets rules: no bridges under a year old, max 0.5 percent slippage, never unaudited pools. Every route quote is filtered and explained in plain words before she signs.
Let anyone encode their risk appetite once, and have every money move respect it in plain words.
People moving stablecoins between chains pick routes by price and speed, because aggregators rank that way. The cheapest path is sometimes a brand new bridge or an unaudited pool, and most individuals have no way to say 'never that' once and have it enforced.
Guardrail Router finds bridge and swap routes, then refuses any path that breaks the user's own safety rules and explains each choice in plain words before they sign. If people use a generic aggregator, that site keeps the integrator fees, the user base and the trust. Own it, and the routing front end, the integrator fee on every route and the brand people associate with 'safe crossings' are yours.
Fifty users routing monthly and one treasury on a paid plan.
Two safety or infrastructure applications submitted.
A deployed router under your name with 100 routes executed.
One submission with a new rule type built during the event.
All your bridging for a month goes through your own rules.
Thirty community members set their own crossing rules.
One partner embedding the router.
Case study sent to five wallet or security teams.
Two treasuries paying for policy setup.
Routing runs through LI.FI and the underlying bridges, and users sign every transaction themselves. Your filter reduces risk; it does not remove it. Say that clearly in the interface and terms, and never call a route 'guaranteed safe'.
The routing, policy filter and explainer come built. You set default rules, branding and your integrator fee address. Adding new rule types later is developer work.
Because big aggregators optimise for price and speed. Yours optimises for the user's own rules. Cautious users, treasuries and communities that have been burned are your audience.
Integrator fees are common, but rules on financial services vary by country. Check with a local adviser before you turn fees on, and do not hold user funds.
Yes. Your domain, your git, your fee address. No custody of user funds at any point.
Lock content behind a fraction-of-a-cent USDC payment, on your own Arc contract. Deploy it, become the onchain creator.
Take pay-what-you-want USDC tips on Base, with a live supporters feed read straight from chain. No Circle account, no backend.
Your own swap/bridge front-end. Integrator fee optional and disclosed.
Recurring USDC on Base. Members approve once, it renews itself. No card processor, no contract.
Write why you entered a trade, seal it with the timestamp, and get graded on reasoning, not luck.
Let a trusted mentor co sign your risky trades above a size you choose.
Your perp bot follows your rules, and every rule you kept becomes a public, provable track record.
A tilt brake that delays your trades after losses until you answer one honest question.