Governance by text-sized questions: one decision a week, answered in ten seconds, with real quorum.
A 400-member creator DAO never hits quorum because proposals are essays. Quiet Quorum sends one plain question a week, members answer in a tap from a mini app, and long-term participation earns a 'steward' reputation that weights future agenda-setting.
Make it normal for every member to have a say, in the time it takes to buy bread.
Member organisations hold real money and real decisions, but long proposals and odd voting windows mean most members never vote, so quorum fails and nothing moves.
Quiet Quorum gets communities to real quorum by asking one plain question a week that members answer in one tap. On a hosted governance tool, your members' votes, steward reputation and results archive live on someone else's platform and roadmap. Own it, and the scheduler, the reputation record and the archive of every decision are yours, deployed from your wallet and branded as your community's own.
Ten communities live and three paying monthly.
Two governance grant applications submitted with participation data.
Verified contracts with 12 weeks of recorded questions.
One submission with a feature built during the event and real votes in the demo.
Weekly decisions made without a single 'please vote' reminder from you.
Weekly participation above 40% of active members.
One partner bundling Quiet Quorum with their service.
A case study with real participation lift sent to five teams.
Two communities paying for setup and a monthly managed service.
You write the weekly question and press schedule. The mini app, quorum tracker and archive come built. Custom voting rules are developer work later.
Some will not. The point is that a ten second question gets far more answers than an essay proposal. Start with a question people care about, send it at a time they are online, and post results the same day.
It does not have to. Many groups use it for weekly temperature checks and keep formal votes for big decisions. You decide what is binding.
Yes. Contracts deploy from your wallet on Base, Optimism or Arbitrum, and the archive is yours to export.
Reputation comes from long term participation, which is slow to fake. Keep the weighting modest and review it each season.
Everyone stakes a conviction, encrypted. The chain tallies it without ever seeing a single take. FHE on Base.
Crowdfunding where backers get refunded by contract if the goal or the milestones are missed.
A shared house or club tracks who did the work, and the record becomes everyone's portable reliability score.
Lend the ladder, the drill, the tent: a street library of things with deposits held by contract.
Fund a public good with hours of your skill, not just money, and get matched like a donation.
A rotating savings circle (ajo, susu, chama) with payouts enforced by contract and trust scores for members.
Retro funding for the quiet helpers: the community nominates who mattered, a pot pays them.
A neighbourhood treasury where proposals unlock only after enough real neighbours physically show up.