Votes weighted by proven expertise on the topic, not by wallet size.
A research collective debates a lab protocol. Wisdom Weight lets members attach credentials (published papers, peer attestations), and votes on lab questions weigh the biologists more while budget votes stay one person one vote.
Let communities give knowledge a fair voice on the questions it fits, without turning it into a crown or letting money buy it.
Research collectives, open source groups and professional communities make technical decisions by token or headcount, so a lab protocol can be set by whoever holds the most tokens. Pure expert rule is no better: it hands the purse to a few. Groups need expertise to count on the questions it fits, and only there.
Token voting hands decisions to whoever holds the most coins, even on questions only experts can judge. Wisdom Weight lets members attach credentials and peer attestations, weighs votes by proven expertise on each topic, and keeps budget votes one person one vote. Owning it means you run the governance tool for research collectives, guilds and clubs: your weighting templates, your clients and your subscription revenue.
10 paying organizations running at least one weighted vote each.
One application.
Verified contracts, profile, 5 completed votes.
One submission.
Your group decides one technical question in a week instead of a month.
20 members link credentials.
One partner network.
Case study in five applications.
Two paying clients.
Yes. Credential linking via EAS, topic categories, per topic weighting rules, proposal and vote UI and transparency report are built. You configure topics and caps and deploy from your wallet with the guide.
It can be, which is why it applies only to topics where expertise matters and budget or values votes stay one person one vote. Weight caps stop any single expert dominating. Publish the rules.
Linked credentials (papers, certifications) and peer attestations from other members. It is not perfect; let members challenge a credential and review weights each season.
Not easily. Start with a new decision, not a migration: one technical question run in Wisdom Weight alongside the usual vote.
Yes: contracts and schemas deploy from your wallet and every collective you onboard runs on your instance.
Everyone stakes a conviction, encrypted. The chain tallies it without ever seeing a single take. FHE on Base.
Governance by text-sized questions: one decision a week, answered in ten seconds, with real quorum.
Crowdfunding where backers get refunded by contract if the goal or the milestones are missed.
A shared house or club tracks who did the work, and the record becomes everyone's portable reliability score.
Lend the ladder, the drill, the tent: a street library of things with deposits held by contract.
Fund a public good with hours of your skill, not just money, and get matched like a donation.
A rotating savings circle (ajo, susu, chama) with payouts enforced by contract and trust scores for members.
Retro funding for the quiet helpers: the community nominates who mattered, a pot pays them.